This post is prompted by the fact that I was issued with a 'Notice of Investigation' (NoI) by the British Labour Party Complaints Team, arising from something I put on Facebook but which I
also put in a
post on this blog. The Complaints Team have told me they received a complaint about my Facebook post in May 2020, and they issued the NoI in August 2021. I responded within 7 days as required but they are unable to say when it will be resolved.
The charge from
the Labour Party
“Dr Chapman (the Respondent) has engaged in conduct prejudicial and
/ or grossly detrimental to the Party in breach of Chapter 2, Clause
I.8 of the Labour Party Rule Book by engaging in conduct which
A - may reasonably be seen to demonstrate hostility or prejudice
based on race;
B - may reasonably be seen to involve racist stereotypes and
sentiments;
C - undermines the Party’s ability to campaign against racism:
i. On 25 May 2020, a complaint was raised against Dr Chapman after he
shared a post to Facebook that contained an antisemitic meme with the
Star of David, referring* to it as a conspiracy theory.”
*This is factually
incorrect in that I didn’t refer to it as a conspiracy
theory, the diagram was labelled “conspiracy theory” in the
original source.
The ‘Philosophy
Matters’ image
The post in question
shared the image below, which was taken from a post on the ‘Philosophy Matters’ Facebook page.
Anyone who has been
reading this blog will immediately see the similarity of this
diagrams to the ‘dots and lines’ that I have been using to help
understand the nature of information. (See, for example, Facts, data and information. But above all, the narrative.)
The series of images
(without the final frame) in the Philosophy Matters diagram is a
graphical representation of the “DIKW” hierarchy
(data-information-knowledge-wisdom – with ‘insight’ added in
this case – see Section 2.1 of Chapman and Ramage 2021).
The idea is that
data are linked by a narrative to become information. Dots on the
diagrams are the data (“facts”), and the lines joining the dots
represent the narrative. Information is defined as meaningful data,
so the narrative gives meaning to the data to turn them into
information. (Alternatively, the ‘information’ is the process
of giving meaning to the data.) The Philosophy Matters image
presents similar ideas but also attempts to illustrate knowledge,
insight and wisdom within the narrative by colouring the dots and
lines.
An important insight
from the work of the 'Difference That Makes a Difference (DTMD) project led by Dr Magnus Ramage and me, together with other members
of the Critical Information Studies Research Group, is that information is never ethically neutral
and is always shaped by power, authority and hierarchy (see Chapman
and Ramage 2021).
To a naïve
(uncritical) reductionist the data (facts) are incontestable and with
any set of data there is one unique true narrative. But reality is
not like that. There is the choice of which data to include in
narrative (which points to display) and then more than one narrative will fit any set of data,
leaving plenty of space for things like ideology and politics.
But it is not that
‘anything goes’. Data have to be true to be information (the
veridicality thesis of information - see Luciano Floridi, “The
Philosophy of Information”, OUP 2011, chapter 4) and the data
constrain the narrative. Some narratives fit the data and some don’t.
The final frame of
the Philosophy Matters image illustrates this
idea by drawing a Star of David to represent a conspiracy-theorist
imposing an antisemitic conspiracy [1] narrative on the data, even
though it simply does not fit the data.
Conspiracy theorists
do this because their ideology is antisemitic.
[1] Antisemitic conspiracy theories:
“The claims that “the Jews” or “Zionists” are in possession of considerable wealth, power and influence, and are using it to control democratic governments, financial institutions, media corporations, and cultural establishments...”
Will Yarokberg, Section 6.6 of “Antisemitism: From Its Origins to the Present.” FutureLearn online, which I studied in March/April 2019. Accessed 13 August 2021.
Comment
It should be clear from the discussion above that, far from being antisemitic, the Philosophy Matters diagram is anti-antisemitism. It is mocking conspiracy theorists. To reiterate: the point is that the Star of David is not a legitimate interpretation of the data (that is why it is labelled 'conspiracy theory'). I struggle to understand how my sharing of this post can be deemed to be conduct prejudicial and/or grossly detrimental to the Party. The only way that I can make sense of it is that the complainant knows that I am a supporter of Jeremy Corbyn, believes Jeremy Corbyn to be antisemitic, saw the Star of David, and drew a false and damaging conclusion without either thinking it through or asking me about it. The fact that that the complaint referred to my Facebook post which was only supposed to be visible to my (approximately 200) Facebook 'friends' is disturbing.
